Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health benefits of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electronic cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the various possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should consider the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
Most of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the result of second hand smoke. It also assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author Juul Pods suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the effect of tobacco products, while providing a much less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking is to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, if they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. What makes vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking cigarettes, without the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers could be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. It also means that they’re taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of the lack of nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative unwanted effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The writer does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t seem to think about the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we need to do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so because of other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are numerous reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we have to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we take in through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is absolutely no real proof that reducing the number of chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the idea that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals within regular cigarettes.